<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A rant about QWERTY</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cacoethes.co.uk/blog/uncategorized/a-rant-about-qwerty/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cacoethes.co.uk/blog/uncategorized/a-rant-about-qwerty</link>
	<description>A search for meaning in software and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 21:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.cacoethes.co.uk/blog/uncategorized/a-rant-about-qwerty/comment-page-1#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cacoethes.co.uk/blog/?p=178#comment-825</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not worried about it - what will be, will be. I just think that QWERTY was an automatic decision without any real thought or research. If there is solid research that suggests the average person is more comfortable with QWERTY on a touch screen than alphabetical order, then I&#039;ll accept the decision without complaint. It will still bug me though :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not worried about it &#8211; what will be, will be. I just think that QWERTY was an automatic decision without any real thought or research. If there is solid research that suggests the average person is more comfortable with QWERTY on a touch screen than alphabetical order, then I&#8217;ll accept the decision without complaint. It will still bug me though <img src='http://www.cacoethes.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Passell</title>
		<link>http://www.cacoethes.co.uk/blog/uncategorized/a-rant-about-qwerty/comment-page-1#comment-823</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Passell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 02:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cacoethes.co.uk/blog/?p=178#comment-823</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s funny.  I feel exactly the opposite way.  Even though I touch-type and am awfully familiar with alphabetic order, my brain seems to be much faster at finding a specific letter in a QWERTY layout than in an alphabetic one.

Are you really that worried about people being unfamiliar with the QWERTY layout in countries where it&#039;s dominant? (I realize it isn&#039;t everywhere)  As you pointed out, for better or worse, QWERTY has a long history.  I bet there are many grannies out there who are experts in the layout, even if it comes from experience with a typewriter rather than a computer keyboard.

--Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s funny.  I feel exactly the opposite way.  Even though I touch-type and am awfully familiar with alphabetic order, my brain seems to be much faster at finding a specific letter in a QWERTY layout than in an alphabetic one.</p>
<p>Are you really that worried about people being unfamiliar with the QWERTY layout in countries where it&#8217;s dominant? (I realize it isn&#8217;t everywhere)  As you pointed out, for better or worse, QWERTY has a long history.  I bet there are many grannies out there who are experts in the layout, even if it comes from experience with a typewriter rather than a computer keyboard.</p>
<p>&#8211;Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

